11:11 to: Wendi Liu 1 
Thanks for the introduction. Could you please explain some more about the "New Communities"? 

11:49 to: Alfonso Bueno 
Perfect! 

11:54 to: Alfonso Bueno 
Thanks a million 

14:03 to: georg 
Thx Chris, Lisa and Xu for the introduction. georg from uni Hertfordshire here. Are there sw license requirements. I am thinking of problemns that might arise if open source is required and there are  

14:03 to: georg 
clashes with the existing licenses, or problems arising releasing work back 

14:48 to: Manuel Menezes 
Hi there. I was unclear on the acronym FTE. Also, where can I find information on the actual amounts available per person-month etc? 

15:45 to: georg 
ok , perfect. 

17:50 to: Manuel Menezes 
great, thanks 

18:16 to: Nick Hine 
Hi –thanks for the intro. You mentioned it was important that the proposal not be seen as “ew science” I’ wondering if you could say more about how you define that. If one wants to implement an ex 

18:16 to: Nick Hine 
isting algorithm/technique from a different methodology, but transfer it to a new domain, sometimes all possible applications, even demonstrations and tests, will be “ew science”because they are som 

18:16 to: Nick Hine 
ething that could not previously been done. Surely we should be looking to demonstrate that the new method works as part of the project? I’ wondering where the line lies. 

20:08 to: Hainam Do 1 
Hi, can a postdoc apply for this funding? If so can he/she uses it to fund themself? 

20:20 to: Nick Hine 
OK - thanks. 

21:02 to: Hainam Do 1 
Fantastic! 

21:06 to: Hainam Do 1 
Thank you very much! 

21:34 to: georg 
Would your expect an optimizing or new algorithm proposal to include archer staff time. It seems  vital to have communication with the local team for hw specifics. what share do you see, say 10% of ar 

21:34 to: georg 
cher staff, 90% us? 

22:21 to: Alfonso Bueno 
Do the eCSE grant come associated with kAUs in ARCHER? 

23:17 to: Thomas Burel 
Hi, do you provide founding to buy software to develop the code as debugger? Founding for staff, an intern could be considered as a staff? 

24:30 to: georg 
ok, thank you 

25:35 to: Alfonso Bueno 
Thanks! 

27:10 to: Thomas Burel 
a student who is doing an internship. 

28:08 to: Richard Wheatley 
Does this grant affect applications for Archer time for production runs on the new code? 

28:34 to: Thomas Burel 
Thanks 

29:25 to: Richard Wheatley 
That was what I was getting at - thanks. 

30:49 to: Richard Wheatley 
Are details of previous grants available? 

31:26 to: Xu Guo (EPCC) 
https://www.archer.ac.uk/community/eCSE/eCSE-projects.php 

31:40 to: Richard Wheatley 
Thanks again! 

31:52 to: J Tyacke 
Thanks for your help 

32:51 to: georg 
Ok, I'll ask something more specific then. Do you provide archer optimized lin systems solvers? I have seen most HPC facilities in some sort or other provde their own, but sw licenses are often restri 

32:51 to: georg 
ctive. How could this work together with a GPL project when releasing the work back> 

32:52 to: georg 
? 

33:39 to: Manuel Menezes 
Thank you 

34:06 to: Alfonso Bueno 
Could you explain a bit about the two-stage process? The deadline for the 19/01 is for the technical review or the final application? 

34:15 to: jme 
If I understood correctly, a postdoc can apply to fund himself, and this requires his institution to be OK with it.  Are there any additional requirements as having a permanent Co-I? Does the Co-I has 

34:15 to: jme 
 to be from the same institution? 

35:19 to: georg 
yes it does - sry no audio 

37:43 to: Alfonso Bueno 
Thanks for the clarification! 

37:48 to: Alfonso Bueno 
very much 

39:33 to: Alfonso Bueno 
Thanks for the session! 

39:40 to: jme 
Yes, thank you. 

39:59 to: Starignus 
I would like to know if it is possible to add more functionalities to the current available libries, as ASE, and extend their interface with others softwares like  CRYSTAL. As well to make some set of 

39:59 to: Starignus 
 benchmark for specific materials that could help userst to run more efficently in archer VASP, CRYSTL, Quantum Espresso? 

42:31 to: Starignus 
basically the benchmark is to test the scalibility with the number of cores that will be use for an specific calculation, some are new inexpert users, so they could get some good research done runnnin 

42:31 to: Starignus 
g efficently. 

43:19 to: Wendi Liu 1 
May I know some more information on "Supporting Documents" on SAFE application. For example, is there any tamplate on the letters of support? Is there any other documents needed? Thanks. 

45:12 to: georg 
You mention the 'archer community', could you describe who exactly this is? Would this refer to the group who technically (through grants or otherwise)  can get access to Archer or include a wider UK  

45:12 to: georg 
sci audience? 

45:38 to: Wendi Liu 1 
Thanks a lot 

46:25 to: jme 
If PI and Co-I are from different institutions, and software developer is employed by institution of PI, does the Co-I institution get any overheads at all? 

46:38 to: georg 
ok. thx 

46:54 to: jme 
(I assume the Co-I gets some travel funds, at most) 

47:49 to: jme 
OK, thank you 

48:52 to: Starignus 
Hi I got a technical problem with the wifi and connection got interrupted. is it possible to have at the end of the talk a summary of the questions you ar answering. It would be really helpful. Hope i 

48:52 to: Starignus 
t could be possible.Thanks in advance. 

49:37 to: Starignus 
Thanks! 

49:47 to: Nick Hine 
Thanks for the session 

50:02 to: jme 
won't you post it in youtube? 

51:14 to: Starignus 
How technical should be the proposal? 

51:17 to: georg 
Lisa, Xu and Chris, thank you very much for your time and this informative sessions it was really helpful. 

53:52 to: Starignus 
Yes, thanks! So to who we can send our proposal to get a feedback before the final submission? 

54:28 to: Starignus 
Thanks Chris 

55:18 to: Starignus 
All the inforamtion was really useful! 

55:41 to: jme 
Yes, it was extremely useful, thank you. 

57:12 to: Wendi Liu 1 
Thanks you for the information