ARCHER logo ARCHER banner

The ARCHER Service is now closed and has been superseded by ARCHER2.

  • ARCHER homepage
  • About ARCHER
    • About ARCHER
    • News & Events
    • Calendar
    • Blog Articles
    • Hardware
    • Software
    • Service Policies
    • Service Reports
    • Partners
    • People
    • Media Gallery
  • Get Access
    • Getting Access
    • TA Form and Notes
    • kAU Calculator
    • Cost of Access
  • User Support
    • User Support
    • Helpdesk
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • ARCHER App
  • Documentation
    • User Guides & Documentation
    • Essential Skills
    • Quick Start Guide
    • ARCHER User Guide
    • ARCHER Best Practice Guide
    • Scientific Software Packages
    • UK Research Data Facility Guide
    • Knights Landing Guide
    • Data Management Guide
    • SAFE User Guide
    • ARCHER Troubleshooting Guide
    • ARCHER White Papers
    • Screencast Videos
  • Service Status
    • Detailed Service Status
    • Maintenance
  • Training
    • Upcoming Courses
    • Online Training
    • Driving Test
    • Course Registration
    • Course Descriptions
    • Virtual Tutorials and Webinars
    • Locations
    • Training personnel
    • Past Course Materials Repository
    • Feedback
  • Community
    • ARCHER Community
    • ARCHER Benchmarks
    • ARCHER KNL Performance Reports
    • Cray CoE for ARCHER
    • Embedded CSE
    • ARCHER Champions
    • ARCHER Scientific Consortia
    • HPC Scientific Advisory Committee
    • ARCHER for Early Career Researchers
  • Industry
    • Information for Industry
  • Outreach
    • Outreach (on EPCC Website)

You are here:

  • ARCHER

Can't list the navigation items at the moment. Please try again later.

  • ARCHER Community
  • ARCHER Benchmarks
  • ARCHER KNL Performance Reports
  • Cray CoE for ARCHER
  • Embedded CSE
  • ARCHER Champions
  • ARCHER Scientific Consortia
  • HPC Scientific Advisory Committee
  • ARCHER for Early Career Researchers

Contact Us

support@archer.ac.uk

Twitter Feed

Tweets by @ARCHER_HPC

ISO 9001 Certified

ISO 27001 Certified

Microvasculature blood flow simulation using HemeLB

eCSE001-010

Key Personnel

PI/Co-I: Miguel O. Bernabeu - UCL; Timm Krüger - University of Edinburgh; Peter V. Coveney, James Hetherington, Bruno Silva - UCL

Technical: Mayeul d'Avezac, Owain Kenway, Ian Kirker, Jens Nielsen, Gary Macindoe - UCL

Relevant Documents

eCSE Final Report: Adding a resolved deformable particle model to a highly-parallel blood flow solver for sparse vascular networks

Project summary

HemeLB is an open source, highly-parallel, lattice-Boltzmann (LB) blood flow simulator which is very well suited for the simulation of blood flow in large vascular trees using state-of-the-art supercomputing resources.

In previous work, HemeLB modelled blood as a shear-thinning homogeneous fluid rather than a complex particle suspension. This simplification is suitable for the study of haemodynamics in larger vessels (i.e. those with diameters larger than a few hundred micrometres). However it fails to capture important haemorheological features when applied to the simulation of blood flow in capillaries, especially as vessel calibre gets closer to, or even smaller than, the typical red blood cell (RBC) diameter of ~8 micrometres. This shortcoming limited the degree of fidelity in the estimates of wall shear stress (WSS).

The main objective of this project was to implement a model of deformable particles into the HemeLB flow solver, to allow the modelling of blood as a dense suspension of deformable particles and facilitate the theoretical study of advanced aspects of haemorheology, oxygen transport, and cell trafficking in realistic vascular networks.

The main components to be implemented were: a) the immersed boundary method for fluid-structure interaction, b) a finite element model of particle membrane elastic deformation, and c) a procedure for simulation initialisation. An important challenge to be overcome in the project was developing a generic implementation of the previous algorithms that could scale up well in terms of domain complexity and particle volume fraction without undermining the excellent parallel scalability of HemeLB.

Thanks to the work done in this eCSE project, we can now model blood as a suspension of deformable particles. The work represents a substantial leap forward for the simulation of blood flow in microvasculature and enables for the first time the theoretical study of advanced aspects of haemorheology, oxygen transport, and cell trafficking in realistic vascular networks. This has already started to provide a much more accurate picture of the WSS experienced by the microvasculature. Furthermore, this will enable the theoretical study of the collective dynamics of dense RBC suspensions in complex vessel geometries.

Snapshot of simulation and wall shear stress traces at two points of interest
Left panel: Snapshot of the simulation at one of the regions of interest. RBC membranes are rendered in red. The flow field is plotted at the plane perpendicular to the viewer and containing the vessel centreline. Right panels: WSS traces at two points of interest (indicated by the origin of the red arrows). In the mother vessel (bottom) both RBC and homogeneous model have a good agreement. However, in the vicinity of a sharp turn (top), the homogeneous model greatly overestimates WSS due to its inability to capture complex rheological effects. In both cases, the homogeneous model fails to capture the temporal complexity of the WSS signal recovered with the RBC model.
Snapshot of simulation and wall shear stress traces at two points of interest
Left panel: Snapshot of the simulation at one of the regions of interest. RBC membranes are rendered in red. The flow field is plotted at the plane perpendicular to the viewer and containing the vessel centreline. Right panels: WSS traces at two points of interest (indicated by the origin of the red arrows). We see again that in the mother vessel (top) both RBC and homogeneous model have a good agreement. However, in the presence of a loop (bottom), the RBC model predicts a much lower WSS level due to the RBC depletion effect associated with the increased flow resistance of the loop.

Summary of the software

The main code used in this project was HemeLB, an open source, highly-parallel, lattice-Boltzmann (LB) blood flow simulator developed by the Centre for Computational Science (CCS), University College London (UCL). HemeLB's main codebase currently receives contributions from additional UK research groups at The University of Edinburgh and Brunel University, London.

HemeLB is a C++/Python application. The main computational kernel is written in C++ and all the pre- and post-processing tools are written in Python. The code is version controlled with Git with a release version being pushed to GitHub (https://github.com/UCL/hemelb). HemeLB is developed using a test-driven approach. Our continuous integration system runs unit and regression tests (currently 136 tests making 448 assertions) after each commit and also every night across a range of supported platforms. Software development is managed using a Scrum process with fortnightly sprints. The HemeLB development team is made of a core of 3-4 developers at UCL and The University of Edinburgh, and a number of external collaborators. HemeLB has successfully run on the following top 500 machines: ARCHER, HECToR, SuperMUC, and Kraken.

Copyright © Design and Content 2013-2019 EPCC. All rights reserved.

EPSRC NERC EPCC